The Value of Organic Search Rankings

Search has changed over the years, from results page redesigns to algorithm tweaks. But for digital marketers search remains their most important focus, at least measured by spending, and is a critical tool to drive traffic to marketer websites. Research from SEO services firm Slingshot SEO gives marketers new benchmarks for the click value of high-ranking keywords.

Slingshot SEO found that clickthrough rates dropped from 18.2% in first position to 10.05% in second position to 7.22% in third position, and continued to diminish thereafter. Overall, just over half of search users click on an organic result on the first page, and more than half of those choose the first or second link.

Average Organic Clickthrough Rate for Google Results for US-Based Searches, by Position in Search Engine Results Page, June 2011

But this curve was shallower than in some previously reported studies on search click rates, the report noted. In December 2010, marketing services firm Optify found a 36.4% clickthrough rate for the first result on the page, with a steeper drop to 12.5% for the second result. A 2007 study by Enquiro Search Solutions (now Mediative) fell in the middle.

While the age of those studies could mean that user behavior on the search results page has changed, methodological differences make that difficult to determine.

The Slingshot SEO study also found that high-ranked keywords could help drive traffic to long-tail keywords that include the high-ranking word or phrase. For example, a marketer whose website ranks high for “shoes” would also get a boost in traffic from searches on “high-heeled shoes” or “red shoes.” There was not a clear correspondence between exact rank of the original keyword and clicks on the long-tail keyword, however.

Average Organic vs. Long-Tail Clickthrough Rate for Google Results for US-Based Searches, by Position in Search Engine Results Page, June 2011

The value of having a high-ranking search result on the first page of Google results should be clear to marketers: The lion’s share of search traffic will to go just a few terms on the front page, whether the curve is somewhat steeper or somewhat shallower. And there is an additional value from maintaining these high-ranking keywords—and the valuable, attractive content they represent—in driving traffic from less-searched, longer terms.

Prospecting With Search-And-Display

The Purchase Funnel

The much ballyhooed search-and-display convergence has been lighting up the digital airwaves for over a year now as startup companies either enter the space looking to provide a solution, or media agencies, search engine marketers, ad networks and DSPs add the search-display channel to its offering.

Yet, it remains early days for a publicly available, truly integrated, cross-channel solution. Behind the curtain, I’ll guess big, smart e-commerce companies like Amazon are effectively doing it themselves. GSI Commerce is obviously trying to get its arms around it with this week’s acquisition of ClearSaleing. Others trumpet their solutions.  And, of course, there is Google.

The goal is to provide the marketer with a clear understanding of all the touchpoints up and down the funnel within a search-and-display campaign to get a sense of appropriate attribution for each marketing tactic – each cookie, each display ad, each landing page (URL) and/or each keyword phrase.  With this information in hand, the reasoning is that the marketer will open the pocketbook as they spend according to the attribution model, which will lead to more conversions, revenue, etc.

But it’s clear. Search-and-display - it’s not so simple.

What’s Simple: Search Retargeting

The first step to bringing the two channels together for many marketers has been search retargeting. (FYI, Search retargeting is the Google display ad knockout blow. Read this AdExchanger.com classic post! ) This makes perfect sense.  It’s the proverbial low-hanging fruit.

To review, with search, bottom-of-the-funnel intent is captured from users, which is the reason Google makes all those billions by running relevant ads when you most want to see them –when you’re showing your interest in a particular topic, product or service.

Search retargeting in display advertising allows the marketer to re-message the consumer after they have input keywords in a search engine and shown intent.

Today’s search retargeting can work in different ways. One example: you put “new samsung phone” in Google (or any other search engine) and then you click a PPC ad or you click an organic search listing and you visit a landing page.

SERP

Assuming the landing page has a pixel placed by the marketer, you’re cookie’d and the keywords on which you “rode” can be attached to that cookie.  That’s valuable data and a powerful signal – retargeting time!

So, the marketer says, “Mr. Sulu, prepare the display ads!” as she or he uses the cookie to retarget website display ad placements available through an ad exchange, ad network, aggregator or a publisher.  With the appropriate message, the marketer looks to convert the user who has just shown intent – which is almost always time sensitive.

Search retargeting is step one of search-and-display.  And, it works.  The trouble is – no scale.

One way to go, is to increase scale through the purchase of look-a-like cookies which are matched along various attributes to the cookies set on marketers' landing pages. As marketers become increasingly sophisticated, this will be another important layer.  Certainly, there’s complexity here too as the look-a-like cookies exhibit behaviors similar to the target, but maybe not exactly like the intended target. The consumer behind these cookies will need to be driven down the funnel to conversion.

This is a microcosm of where search-and-display really needs to go: the domain of television. Generate or create the demand - not just fulfill it.  It’s time for prospecting and working down the funnel rather than up!

What’s Hard: Prospecting

The Purchase Funnel V2

O.K., the graphic is a bit of an over-simplification but you get the point. The little blue dots are the consumers in the funnel.. there’s a lot more closer to display (on websites) than search.

For display-driven, search-and-display, the three levers of optimization interplay in hopes of successfully prospecting for conversions:

  • Creative – The display ad itself… its message, the colors, the rich-ness (text, graphical, video).  Much different demand generation messaging than search retargeting where the message speaks to intent.
  • Context – A website or URL… The landing page informs on the audience, potential intent; layouts can affect creative (above or below the fold, etc.); lots of variables as websites across exchanges, aggregators and ad networks become landing pages.
  • Audience – The cookie… as the user is shown messages within context of websites, intent is hopefully built.  The sequencing of messaging can become important – whoa, I don’t hear of a lot of that going on – where the consumer sees ads that build on a story and gradually create intent.

The complexity (and opportunity) doesn’t stop there for the marketer…

In the end, the display-driven, search-and-display consumer is guided to search for a paid search or a listing courtesy of organic search (search engine optimization). Or the consumer goes right to the branded website.

via : http://www.adexchanger.com/online-advertising/prospecting-with-search-and-display/

The Web Passes Newspapers in Ad Spending For First Time ! YES!

Advertisers will spend more on internet ads in 2010 than newspaper ads for the first time, according to new estimates by eMarketer.

Online ad spending will grow 13.9% to $25.8 billion for the full year in 2010, while advertisers are expected to spend just $22.78 billion on print newspaper ads this year, down 8.2% from 2009, eMarketer estimates.

Total newspaper ad revenues from print and online ads are expected to hit $25.7 billion this year, still shy of the $25.8 billion advertisers will spend on internet ads. “Marketers are devoting bigger shares of their budgets to digital media as they see more customers shifting time toward the web,” said Geoff Ramsey, CEO of eMarketer. “It’s something we’ve seen coming for a long time, but this is a tipping point.”

Increased consumer use of the Web isn’t the only reason marketers are putting more dollars online, he added.

“The bad economy has actually accelerated the shift to digital advertising,” Mr. Ramsey said. “Online ads˜especially search ads˜are increasingly seen by many marketers as a more reliable bet than print ads, which are are often difficult to tie to a measurable financial result.” While total ad spending in the US is expected to bounce back for the full year, growing 3% in 2010 to $168.5 billion, newspaper spending is expected to continue its decline next year. eMarketer estimates that print newspaper ad spending will slide to $21.4 billion in 2011, down 6% from 2010. On the other hand, online ad spending is expected to grow 10.5% in 2011 to reach $28.5 billion. eMarketer benchmarks its US newspaper ad spending projections against data from the Newspaper Association of America (NAA), for which the last full year measured was 2009.

In Western Europe, Online Advertising Bounces Back

Single-digit growth will be the norm through 2014

Western Europe accounts for 27.7% of global online ad spending in 2010, worth $17.1 billion, eMarketer estimates. In 2014, regional spending will rise to $24.3 billion. Annual growth rates will be healthy, but with the exception of 2012—the year the Olympic Games will be held in London—increases will fall in the single digits.

“The recovery is fragile, but 2010 has brought renewed financial growth and a degree of optimism,” said Karin von Abrams, eMarketer senior analyst and author of the new report “Western Europe Online Ad Spending: Leading the Recovery.” “Digital channels, which helped advertisers weather the worst of the crisis, will benefit further as budgets gradually expand.”

Online Advertising Spending in Western Europe, 2010 & 2014 (billions)

Italy and Spain still lag behind France and Germany in the share of advertising going to the web. And while these less developed online markets are now growing more quickly, they are unlikely to ever completely mirror more advanced countries. eMarketer estimates that online ad spending in France, one of the strongest European markets, will reach €1.92 billion ($2.69 billion) in 2010, and approach €2.61 billion ($3.65 billion) in 2014. Estimates of spending and growth in the country vary markedly.

Comparative Estimates: Online Ad Spending Growth in France, 2009-2014 (% change)

“These variations imply lingering doubts about how badly the French economy as a whole will be affected by imminent austerity measures, rising unemployment and minimal advances in GDP,” said von Abrams. Estimates of online ad spending growth in Germany are similar but somewhat more optimistic. Steady growth is also expected in Italy and Spain, but from a smaller base.

Online Video Advertising Set To Become The Favoured “Channel”?

Lately, we have been hearing much about online video and the rise of social media communities, but how could these possibly be a threat to search engines? Yahoo!, MSN, and Google hold the largest share in the online advertising market, but their market share could well be halved if social networks become more popular. With over 65% of internet users now accessing Google to search for goods, services, or just general interest, it would seem like online ads would be best served on the search giant. But beyond this there are other forms of advertising that are starting to knock on the door and give search-based ads a real run for their money. Some of the more traditional online channels have included banner advertising, classifieds, and directories, where you would create an ad, choose the appropriate channel and simply publish the ad. Search engine Google recognises the need for people to â??get what they wantâ? through search and out of this created the paid service Google Adwords, in which people effectively pay to get to the top of Google. This, although potentially quite expensive depending on your industry keywords, it is a very popular advertising channel, and can yield some great results, if done correctly. This model, which is one of Googleâ??s primary monetising services, tries to make search ads as relevant as possible via its various search algorithms. But with online traffic now moving towards current buzz â??social mediaâ?, websites such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube are becoming more and more popular with people starting to publish their material online at a far more frequent rate than ever before.

You can create and account, add friends, create events, uploads images and videos, and almost manage your entire social life online via this application. Online traffic analytics firm Nielson recently concluded that the UKs most used brand was Facebook with 62 billion minutes being spent on the website during April. With vast communities popping up across these networks, it is also the ideal place for businesses and individuals to place targeted ads, and Google knows it. One of the key components of these networks is the ability to upload video content. With technology evolving, allowing us to capture images and video via phone or other handheld devises, we are in position to capture a moment and distribute it for the world to see.

One of the key components of Search Engine Marketing is being able to use a particular channel to distribute/publish relevant content to help push a companyâ??s online awareness. Using video, it is not only possible to publish an advert for a chosen demographic, but it will also be possible for people to have video ads served to them based on their particular needs and requirements. So, if you are into cars, it will soon be possible to have car ads served to you based on comprehensive analytics, which contains details about behavioural activity online. This analytical data is the key to knowing what people want to see and what should be served to them. Thus resulting in highly targeted video ads and saving huge sums of money on traditional TV adverts.

So, could this spell the end for search engines as we know them? Well, there will always be a need for search based applications like Google, even if people use social media more. There is no rule preventing Google from incorporating targeted video based advertising into its applications and currently all of the big three search engines are looking to add this string to their bow.

Google to Alter Keyword Ad Policy in Europe

The Internet giant Google said Wednessday that it would change its search policy for most of Europe to allow advertisers to buy and use terms that have been trademarked by others as keywords. Previously, brand owners could file a trademark complaint with Google to prevent third-party ads from being returned alongside the results of a search of a trademarked name, such as Louis Vuitton or Prada. The decision will be effective Sept. 14 and extends to the rest of Europe changes that were made in Britain and Ireland in 2008. In the United States and Canada, Google has been implementing the policy since 2004. Google’s move stems from a decision by the European Court of Justice in March. The court broadly ruled that Google had respected trademark law by allowing advertisers to bid for keywords corresponding to third-party trademarks.Brand owners, led by the French luxury goods company LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, had argued that only they or authorized sites should be able to buy and use such trademarked terms in searches, so as to protect their brand value. They now face the prospect of having the ads of third-parties offering their products being displayed in search results. Trademark owners who feel that third-party ads confuse users as to the origin of the goods and services will still be able to file complaints with Google, and the search company said it would take down the ads if it agrees that they are confusing. Dominic Batchelor, a London-based corporate partner at the legal firm Ashurst, said the decision “will come as a blow to rights holders” in the battle “over policing content in a challenging online environment.” “The onus will be on rights holders to monitor and assert their rights,” he said. “How readily Google responds to complaints about infringing use remains to be seen.” Ben Novick, Google’s communications manager for the region, stressed that the company would continue banning ads for counterfeit goods. “We work with multiple brands to identify counterfeit goods,” he said. Google’s clients are now being informed of the changes. Legal experts have said that the European ruling stopped short of the definitive precedent that Google and brand owners alike had sought. Instead, it contained caveats that could result in a new flurry of lawsuits over the sale of “sponsored links” generated by Google searches. Google argues that selling brand names as ad keywords to multiple bidders helps consumers because it allows them to find product reviews, sellers of second-hand goods and other information. It stressed that the new policy would not extend to the actual display text in search findings. “Users will benefit from seeing more relevant ads following a search on Google,” Mr. Novick said. After the introduction of the changes in Britain and Ireland there was disquiet among some advertisers, he said, followed by “a period of calm within a few weeks.” The changes will benefit the company’s hugely successful Adwords service, through which advertisers bid for key words and their ads are ranked based on the price paid and other variables. The system works on a pay-per-click basis. The company would not speculate on how much additional revenue the decision might bring. Adwords is the bedrock of the company’s success, accounting for approximately 95 percent of revenue. In the second quarter, Google’s revenue rose to $6.82 billion, from $5.52 billion in the equivalent quarter a year ago. Net profit rose to $1.84 billion from $1.48 billion

Is Search Killing Your Creative?

How to keep your story compelling in an SEO-crazed world

cummings
Telling a compelling brand story has always been the high art of creative advertising. It's even more so in the digital age, where search optimization and search-based metrics have become the new Holy Grail. Unfortunately, for creatives, SEO is like handing a composer the most popular notes, as identified by research, and demanding a hit song. Or giving a writer word magnets from the refrigerator and expecting the Great American Novel.

To make sure your creative isn't DOA with SEO, here's what to do:

If you want to reach the natives of today's consumer world, start by speaking their language. The core keyword list, or modern copywriter's dictionary, often contains keywords that are outdated. For example, the word "stereo" for marketing home theater equipment. Or "applications" when consumers are looking for apps. If your vocabulary is not up to speed, you'll sound strained and out of touch, and, worst of all, your search will be lame because few people are using those dusty words to find what you're selling. But be warned: some terms that sound dated to you or your client may not be dated to your audience. For instance, inside the wireless industry, the term "cell phones" is so 1990s. However, many consumers still use that term today to search for a new mobile phone. So make sure your search terms are not only current but also relevant, in today's vernacular, right up to the very second they go live. Then update your digital content as new terms arise, evaluating at least once a month.

Another common trap in writing for SEO is that the lifeblood of creative writing -- the spark, the surprise, the emotional language -- often gets thrown out with the SEO bathwater. David Carr of The New York Times hit on this recently when writing about journalism in the digital age: "Headlines in newspapers and magazines were once written with readers in mind, to be clever or catchy or evocative," Carr states. "Now headlines are just there to get the search engines to notice." Blogger Mike Lachey makes a similarly amusing point, retitling classic literature to boost Web site traffic: The Great Gatsby becomes 8 Surprising Ways West Egg Is Exemplary of the Hollowness of the American Dream. This challenge of maintaining evocative language is front and center for digital creatives. The clever twist of phrase, the outlandishly exaggerated headline that catches a reader's attention is often sidestepped. Make sure your SEO-savvy copy doesn't evoke Mr. Roboto -- a preprogrammed assembly of key terms that connects with search but doesn't connect with the hearts and minds of your audience. Along with key search terms, make sure that evocative, emotionally rich language stays in your creative mix.

Digital media has been a boon for creatives who are now empowered to stretch their ideas and bring them to life in whole new ways. However, this new creative canvas contains digital nooks and crannies that are often overlooked. SEO brings with it new opportunities for writing great headlines and copy in places such as search results, page titles, image names, alt tags and even URLs. Take advantage of these. For example, don't overlook the chance to write a great headline for the actual search results page. Great copy in these small places is often the hidden surprise that rewards audiences precisely because they are not obvious places to "sell the message." And, for copywriters, they offer an exclusive domain that is always enticing. There are no designers or art directors -- just words, and the power that they alone can have.

When you absolutely, positively have to put mundane keywords in your headline or the account team will run screaming to the partners, relax. You've got more than a few arrows in your creative quiver. One is to pair your SEO yin with some visual yang. The unexpected twist on the familiar is Advertising 101, and it still works. Match your straightforward headline with a surprisingly unexpected visual. For example, a headline such as "The World's Best Bath Soap" could be paired with an image of a large, hairy-backed man unashamedly bathing in public. The subhead: "So Good You'll Want to Use It Everywhere." Now, people searching for "best bath soap" will see your ad and, frankly, get a little grossed out. But their attention is yours. Mission accomplished.

Search is here to stay. As our world churns out more data and information sources in every conceivable medium, search will remain a primary means for audiences to seek out what's relevant. Creatives who embrace this reality and learn to flourish in a world where every word, every letter, is digitized and searched will not only do their careers a big favor, but the brands they work with will also have a much better story to tell.

-By Bryan Cummings

Biz Stone: Twitter is the world's fastest growing search engine !

Twit_1483649c

Twitter now supports 800 million search queries per day, according to Biz Stone, the site’s co-founder, making it the fastest growing search engine, outpacing Yahoo! and Microsoft’s Bing combined.


Talking at the Aspen Ideas Festival, Stone revealed the statistic – which means Twitter’s search engine is serving more than 24 billion searches per month compared to Bing’s approximate 4.1 billion and Yahoo!’s approximate 9.4 billion combined. A study by Nielsen last year discovered that Bing was the fastest growing search engine in the US after its growth increased by over 22 per cent, post its launch. However since last April, Twitter searches have increased by 33 per cent. Google supports approximately 88 billion search queries per month, to put Twitter’s figure into perspective. However, searches performed on Twitter on are performed more with the intention of finding out real-time information. Twitter has search partnerships in place with Google, Microsoft and Bing. These deals, completed in the last nine months for unknown amounts of money and lengths of time, allow each search engine to index all of Twitter’s data and pull it into the main body of search results. Each search engine realised that Twitter’s own search engine was outpacing them with real-time results on live events and wanted a piece of the action.

Evan Williams, Twitter’s chief executive, in an exclusive interview with The Telegraph earlier this year, said that the company was increasingly focussed on improving its search engine. There is a dedicated team of developers actively working to make it more intuitive. At the time of the piece (May), Twitter search was processing 600 million queries a day – mainly through third-party services. Williams explained: “We are working on getting better at surfacing more relevant information and our 'Top Tweets’ function, which prioritises the most re-tweeted updates on Twitter, has helped that process along. “But we know many people are only using our search engine now and consuming information via Twitter – and not tweeting – so we need to make this service as good as other search engines, in terms of generating relevant search results.”